Prince Harry’s bombshell autobiography might not have been “fact-checked in detail” and may not have been fully accurate, a ghostwriter has claimed.
The Duke of Sussex has seen the allegations he made in the memoir Spare challenged after US federal lawyers argued he was granted a visa to the country because the book “isn’t proof” he actually took drugs.
A Washington DC-based think tank, The Heritage Foundation, last week took the Government to court to have details of Harry’s visa application files released after he admitted to taking drugs in his autobiography.
Under US immigration law, illicit substance use or abuse can be used as grounds to deny an applicant access to the country.
In Spare, Harry claimed to have taken cocaine and magic mushrooms as well as to have smoked marijuana.Link
READ MORE: Meghan Markle ‘refused to meet Donald Trump as she ‘does not like him – expert
Fullscreen button
prince harry spare in bookstore
But a ghostwriter with over 80 books to his name told the Daily Express that some of the Duke’s anecdotes may have been somewhat “inaccurate.”
Joshua Lisec said: “In the case of Prince Harry’s visa, the government’s position is that they don’t accept every word of his memoir to be true, so they aren’t going to use it against him.
“Whatever you think of their decision on this case, they are not wrong about the inaccuracy of memoirs.
“While readers often think they are definitive, many memoirs are not fact-checked in detail.
“Often, ghostwriters and publishers only check closely when a section might be potentially libellous about someone else.”